Solar Week - Ask a Question

During solar week you can post questions here for our scientists to answer.
   You do not need to register or sign in to post questions,
   just click on one of the forums below and click "Write a New Post".

   You may want to Meet the scientists who will be answering your questions.
   Check out our new blog and FAQs.
in

sunspot cycles

Last post 03-10-2006 11:55 AM by Yan Li. 3 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 03-09-2006 11:37 AM

    sunspot cycles

    Alejandra (BC)

     

    During the solar mimimum, what's the longest period ever seen without sunspots on the sun, i.e., (days,weeks,months)?

     

     

  • 03-10-2006 6:39 AM In reply to

    Re: sunspot cycles

    Hi Alejandra,

    I don't know the exact longest period in which there were no observed sunspots, but the Sun has gone through periods of decreased sunspot numbers.  Early records of sunspots indicate that the Sun went through a period of inactivity in the late 17th century.  Very few sunspots were seen on the Sun from about 1645 to 1715, a time called the "Maunder Minimum", after the English astronomer Edward W. Maunder who studied this unusual time of solar inactivity.  This period of inactivity also corresponds to a climatic period called the "Little Ice Age" when rivers that are normally ice-free froze and snow fields remained all year at lower altitudes.  The Sun has gone through similar periods of inactivity in the more recent past. 

    Holly

  • 03-10-2006 6:41 AM In reply to

    • Terry Kucera
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 02-27-2005
    • NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD, USA
    • Posts 165

    Re: sunspot cycles

    Hi Alejandra,
    In recent times the answer to your question is "weeks". I was not sure about that so I went to a page which lists the sunspot number.
    http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/SOLAR/ftpsunspotnumber.html#international

    I looked at a file that lists the sunspot number since 1944 and found the longest period with zero sunspot number was 37 days in 1996 (the last sunspot minimum).

    The sunspot number is actually not the same thing as the number of sunspots (they talk about this on that page I mention above), but still, zero sunspot number means no sunspots!

    There may have been longer periods in times past. There was a period from about 1645 to 1715 called the Maunder Minimum where there were very few sunspots at all (although there were some). The period between sunspots during this time may have been even longer.

    Cheers,
    Terry

  • 03-10-2006 11:55 AM In reply to

    Re: sunspot cycles

    Hi Alejandra,
     
    Perhaps you’d like to first see a plot of the sunspot numbers recorded since far back.

    http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/images/ssn_yearly.jpg
     
    You can see there is a period of time when the Sun is very inactive during about 1645 and 1700. That period is called the Maunder minimum, when there looked like could be many years going by without a sunspot. The Sun must have been very boring back then. But as you could also see, it seems to be a very special period of time since we have sunspot records. In recent years, things are looking pretty different. Take the last solar minimum, year 1996, as an example, the longest period without any sunspots is something like six weeks. You may also take a look at this NOAA data page for yourself at

    ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/STP/SOLAR_DATA/SUNSPOT_NUMBERS/1996

    Yan


Page 1 of 1 (4 items)

Theme design is SolarWeek by Igor Ruderman based on
Theme Mira 2007 by Chris Lotter.

Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems